{"id":"W2893737531","doi":"10.1007/s11238-018-9673-9","title":"Sunk ‘Decision Points’: a theory of the endowment effect and present bias","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theory and Decision","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Endowment effect; Situational ethics; Sunk costs; Consumption (sociology); Economics; Endowment; Mechanism (biology); Simple (philosophy); Microeconomics; Inference; Prospect theory; Positive economics; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Epistemology; Sociology; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005507673,0.0004996296,0.001105229,0.001264717,0.0006542291,0.003978342,0.001859104,0.002075156,0.00845002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02633504,0.0004608694,0.001136858,0.001304209,0.004976472,0.008737294,0.002217279,0.003066072,0.0006212258],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001343151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006137769,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008352777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006463384,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997684,0.001100334,0.0000843501,0.0004980916,0.0004439589,0.0001892148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877808,0.008629728,0.001012939,0.001466404,0.0007063441,0.0004037512],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001096027,0.00003928083,0.002362323,0.00009333278,0.00008477891,0.00006599,0.0002868044,0.01150256,0.0005078099,0.9584236,0.0008463612,0.02567751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001395218,0.00002162552,0.0009794428,0.00001760115,0.00001434784,0.00003594328,0.00004151476,0.01691469,0.000160028,0.9809312,0.0008545586,0.00001512249],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1854393,0.003839206,0.7640235,0.008482197,0.0004926782,0.00008330255,0.0002479954,0.0001629593,0.03722883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9513503,0.001145086,0.04191301,0.0005585937,0.0003589125,0.00007080521,0.00007439312,0.00005816451,0.004470749],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00845002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02912772,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0818551225695389,"score_gpt":0.381343428437957,"score_spread":0.2994883058684181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}