{"id":"W2893782355","doi":"10.1177/1541931218621088","title":"Optimal Configuration of a Genetic Algorithm for Command Space Layout Analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting","topic":"Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Swap (finance); Key (lock); Computer science; Genetic algorithm; Algorithm; Mathematical optimization; Process (computing); Population; Search algorithm; Space (punctuation); Mathematics; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008266577,0.0007230703,0.0004993015,0.001389489,0.0006107192,0.0008700938,0.0008405726,0.001003915,0.001819019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003979307,0.0003529642,0.0003540377,0.0008155369,0.0006943012,0.000655961,0.0004751407,0.0005058217,0.0002642658],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001244751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001406116,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005381537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004150473,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995509,0.0001962469,0.00001403272,0.00006644779,0.00009969079,0.00007264518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993882,0.0003208875,0.00005511013,0.00004365386,0.0001577892,0.00003433392],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007108899,0.00005084175,0.0009078886,0.00002253225,0.00001994205,0.00006040061,0.00006295644,0.9664021,0.002040987,0.003646168,0.0003884594,0.02632666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002705155,0.00006231509,0.0003096763,0.000008566728,0.00001721245,0.00002373222,0.00003471984,0.9961772,0.001390776,0.001544758,0.0003954924,0.000008374898],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.291505,0.0004387066,0.6943361,0.0002724456,0.00006616017,0.0002404061,0.00008375928,0.0006423165,0.01241515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8411272,0.00009238749,0.1576005,0.00003950902,0.00000810301,0.0001485918,0.00005390107,0.0000447666,0.0008849868],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005381537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0107004,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01084954491302681,"score_gpt":0.2239997741732694,"score_spread":0.2131502292602426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}