{"id":"W2894033473","doi":"10.2495/eid180371","title":"AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM HEALTH ASSESSMENT OF THE ATHABASCA RIVER MAINSTEM OIL SANDS AREA USING WHITE SUCKER HEALTH","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"WIT transactions on ecology and the environment","topic":"Water Quality and Pollution Assessment","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Oil sands; Sucker; Environmental science; Ecosystem; River ecosystem; Aquatic ecosystem; Petroleum; Ecosystem health; Health assessment; Hydrology (agriculture); Geology; Ecology; Geotechnical engineering; Geography; Biology; Archaeology; Oceanography; Ecosystem services","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001323368,0.0001814453,0.0003137813,0.00003401627,0.0009767977,0.00001242732,0.0002028182,0.00007398541,0.001410547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000001460048,0.0001098887,0.0001097438,0.0001090546,0.001044303,0.00007832485,0.00003539777,0.0002264177,0.00006489344],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006823319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006426976,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006480477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001844791,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976519,0.0009318772,0.0004607048,0.0003119722,0.0003057394,0.0003378045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990457,0.00009619016,0.0003041042,0.0004393223,0.000002236578,0.0001124837],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009357915,0.00609799,0.4412398,0.0005789471,0.001554715,0.000007802675,0.05788005,0.4215595,0.0004403936,0.01061723,0.001744069,0.05734366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005839964,0.001543151,0.8469827,0.0001937941,0.0001862386,0.0000734126,0.001723714,0.1207615,0.0003785287,0.0008604443,0.02091518,0.000541385],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.862162,0.00004815749,0.1190137,0.01617122,0.0005240901,0.0006738107,0.00008517456,0.00002214858,0.001299702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959514,0.0001302884,0.001325974,0.0015574,0.00001925281,0.0000436767,0.000002806462,0.00001149283,0.0009577785],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4057429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995023,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01978979102757465,"score_gpt":0.2615215446796154,"score_spread":0.2417317536520407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}