{"id":"W2894266185","doi":"10.15353/cfs-rcea.v5i3.282","title":"Food for thought: How trade agreements impact the prospects for a national food policy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Food Studies / La Revue canadienne des études sur l alimentation","topic":"Nutrition, Health, and Society Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"Concordia University; Concordia University of Edmonton","keywords":"International trade; General partnership; Negotiation; European union; Harmonization; Commercial policy; Procurement; Food policy; Political science; Economics; Business; International economics; Food security; Geography; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005283554,0.0002857317,0.0003178174,0.00006069919,0.002225414,0.0001254543,0.0002582492,0.000105135,0.00000940962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003894798,0.0001415154,0.000250701,0.0005615102,0.000341154,0.0002137492,0.00002588042,0.00008122413,0.00000104677],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00185072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002527574,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01155965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9742717,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981291,0.00008804978,0.0002842851,0.0004313419,0.0001553411,0.0009118413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980912,0.0005723732,0.0001676647,0.00008194914,0.000704281,0.0003825351],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00104573,0.0009393397,0.04072695,0.003033296,0.01804083,0.00001045611,0.1778429,0.00003343175,0.01512319,0.4451386,0.2411757,0.05688956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003810119,0.03052691,0.4163746,0.0003588587,0.000393276,0.00005137941,0.07493272,0.000108302,0.00173088,0.04167754,0.428504,0.001531493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9627799,0.001704564,0.000007329806,0.02918071,0.0002757241,0.002134908,0.003620652,0.00003833985,0.0002578959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949815,0.0002685942,0.0002240138,0.001565735,0.00152961,0.0009612388,0.000257444,0.000007475899,0.000204424],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.962712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990736,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08125206749949565,"score_gpt":0.2969931951994234,"score_spread":0.2157411276999278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}