{"id":"W2894919336","doi":"10.11575/prism/33992","title":"Whatever Happened to ... R. v. Sault Ste. Marie: the Due Diligence Defence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Due diligence; Forensic engineering; Political science; Law; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007980558,0.0003683394,0.0005202514,0.0006252821,0.0219535,0.008337154,0.002712158,0.02831153,0.004499627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02692817,0.0005684383,0.0008609466,0.0007903369,0.01259892,0.00300438,0.002851707,0.02118186,0.0008703177],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04074519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06470542,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8882666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9209945,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9863455,0.001710067,0.0003912077,0.001821091,0.005324662,0.004407423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913523,0.002480302,0.0005699111,0.0002563444,0.004099453,0.001241731],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005228261,0.0000320317,0.004369263,0.0001093089,0.00004767182,0.002394925,0.02050343,0.0004061665,0.00134283,0.7187558,0.2354019,0.01658442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004499351,0.00008340432,0.007259643,0.0005212399,0.00008924711,0.0009216881,0.01423822,0.0006581112,0.001730525,0.04528143,0.9288166,0.0003550013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.03475574,0.005561447,0.001617413,0.7539055,0.003155123,0.00008183775,0.0001310099,0.00005642678,0.2007356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5086026,0.003279601,0.001394104,0.2886236,0.001275873,0.00004792002,0.0000539409,0.00009465695,0.1966277],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1117334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2956284,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01237327221910358,"score_gpt":0.2188905559664028,"score_spread":0.2065172837472992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}