{"id":"W2894997177","doi":"10.1142/s2382624x1850025x","title":"Management of an Aquatic Invasive Weed with Uncertain Benefits and Damage Costs: The Case of <i>Elodea Canadensis</i> in Sweden","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Economics and Policy","topic":"Biological Control of Invasive Species","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Vetenskapsrådet","keywords":"Weed; Elodea canadensis; Weed control; Biological dispersal; Invasive species; Population; Allee effect; Abundance (ecology); Environmental science; Ecology; Aquatic plant; Biology; Agroforestry; Natural resource economics; Macrophyte; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001427456,0.000094504,0.0001705798,0.00001626968,0.00006932639,0.00002794304,0.0001149073,0.00004086242,0.00001476296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006817495,0.00002673667,0.0000159299,0.00005679475,0.0002829426,0.00005824703,0.00008601333,0.00003678373,9.399405e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002251681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006751176,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06020554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2900594,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994417,0.00003995386,0.0001746103,0.00016073,0.00001963964,0.0001633644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999706,0.00008556177,0.0000688206,0.00005936166,0.00002486179,0.00005537666],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001127136,0.0003089992,0.04660512,0.0001493978,0.0004716377,0.0004452917,0.004652109,0.0001408381,0.08379903,0.2119893,0.0001190212,0.6501921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003330859,0.006998863,0.8889548,0.000283613,0.0001450529,0.0005052564,0.01730036,0.00154478,0.05689925,0.01693649,0.005993692,0.001107016],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954328,0.00006747634,5.814598e-8,0.003390991,0.000008995071,0.0002022398,0.00005614684,0.000002570795,0.0008387207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991137,0.0002281485,0.00003653742,0.0004967087,0.00006709112,0.000008841753,0.000009985633,7.650842e-7,0.00003815771],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8423496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9460526,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02273350817447263,"score_gpt":0.222527021347858,"score_spread":0.1997935131733853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}