{"id":"W2895123429","doi":"10.1016/j.ejor.2018.09.047","title":"Optimizing a mineral value chain with market uncertainty using benders decomposition","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Operational Research","topic":"Mining Techniques and Economics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Calgary","funders":"Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Benders' decomposition; Value (mathematics); Decomposition; Chain (unit); Mathematical optimization; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002808554,0.001557361,0.002603808,0.001316867,0.001039816,0.002994303,0.001357697,0.004472321,0.00741373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006282831,0.002032867,0.001762352,0.001732992,0.001653112,0.003180229,0.001941254,0.002678066,0.0005883766],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002163161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002297561,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008116916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004295554,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991214,0.0004149299,0.00003536543,0.0001588848,0.0001357803,0.0001336803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969085,0.002369735,0.0002091612,0.000120702,0.0002148684,0.0001770881],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002897548,0.0000203874,0.000103022,0.00001888442,0.00001582427,0.00002843779,0.00001039104,0.9921659,0.0001930219,0.005107141,0.0001814119,0.00212661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006181999,0.00001466543,0.00003063975,0.000004650215,0.0000058758,0.000004363086,0.000007687798,0.9930964,0.00009596537,0.006594309,0.0001350247,0.000004169802],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07000411,0.0003831147,0.9187409,0.0008210018,0.00008590926,0.0001086177,0.0002190204,0.0002051769,0.009432124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.752234,0.0004580664,0.2301285,0.000228526,0.0001072929,0.0003241137,0.0004224052,0.0003152011,0.01578209],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008116916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02480137,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07163220766877489,"score_gpt":0.3370308822454136,"score_spread":0.2653986745766387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}