{"id":"W2895164826","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2018.09.011","title":"Precision conservation meets precision agriculture: A case study from southern Ontario","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agricultural Systems","topic":"Land Use and Ecosystem Services","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Agriculture; Profit (economics); Revenue; Set-aside; Ecosystem services; Natural resource economics; Business; Production (economics); Environmental resource management; Agricultural economics; Economics; Ecosystem; Geography; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003221519,0.0002919479,0.0003189861,0.00001874799,0.0004598486,0.0002485654,0.0003204207,0.0001554116,0.000943976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001319942,0.0001438798,0.00008104162,0.0003135845,0.00001896139,0.0005318613,0.0002195629,0.0001260415,0.003540003],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003773424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008895771,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7648504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8548329,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977449,0.0002147405,0.0005168196,0.0006122962,0.0005880579,0.0003232241],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990551,0.00009125784,0.0002658801,0.0003528397,0.00006809663,0.0001668634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008281658,0.0005307178,0.9318125,0.00001748015,0.0001494336,0.0004829074,0.03459609,0.0003558437,0.01169362,0.000003720347,0.01922476,0.001050103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001373998,0.0007331428,0.9293514,0.0001827748,0.0001535599,0.001194471,0.0411399,0.0008815224,0.0005162556,0.00002429875,0.02371476,0.0007338643],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953862,0.00007501592,0.000009875997,0.00007493766,0.0009914261,0.001261001,0.00002856154,0.0001136908,0.002059253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973992,0.000001742043,0.00005046298,0.00002733144,0.0005288504,0.00008345342,0.00005852078,0.00001114126,0.001839308],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08998252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999693,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01374929710110988,"score_gpt":0.2092068869949992,"score_spread":0.1954575898938893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}