{"id":"W2895330846","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.007","title":"Promoting novelty, rigor, and style in energy social science: Towards codes of practice for appropriate methods and research design","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Energy Research & Social Science","topic":"Energy and Environment Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1147,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; Colorado School of Mines; International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis; Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond; Michigan State University; University College London; College of Engineering, Michigan State University; University of East Anglia; University of Texas at Austin; University of Sussex; Research Councils UK; European Commission; Georgia Institute of Technology","keywords":"Novelty; Management science; Computer science; Rigour; Construct (python library); Data science; Quality (philosophy); Engineering ethics; Creativity; Style (visual arts); Research design; Psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Social science; Social psychology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8043212,0.003659427,0.007135438,0.02351534,0.01185609,0.04074087,0.01020587,0.0142957,0.001900603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8330204,0.004428823,0.004621215,0.01620786,0.07878751,0.03283483,0.03314383,0.02360425,0.001776885],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02630235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09530669,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004019705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004802413,"domain_scores_codex":[0.09400775,0.7834859,0.06666732,0.01065314,0.04280894,0.002376897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.06415901,0.6900076,0.0424474,0.1053403,0.09325346,0.004792388],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000450091,0.0004559248,0.006266858,0.02718607,0.0006582962,0.0005039744,0.2084373,0.002807561,0.003655081,0.4148383,0.01632819,0.3184122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006696449,0.0005591555,0.003816832,0.05347356,0.0004128443,0.000635451,0.05028864,0.006893954,0.00376982,0.7576845,0.1211876,0.0006078984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01260714,0.01134211,0.8375109,0.102588,0.004632753,0.01917901,0.0002422847,0.0007214945,0.01117625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0764026,0.003067065,0.8838764,0.006830301,0.0006135756,0.02811668,0.000130041,0.0002496981,0.0007136606],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1956788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2413069,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1241787942311161,"score_gpt":0.4818716216883832,"score_spread":0.357692827457267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}