{"id":"W2895330846","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.007","title":"Promoting novelty, rigor, and style in energy social science: Towards codes of practice for appropriate methods and research design","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Energy Research & Social Science","topic":"Energy and Environment Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1147,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council; Colorado School of Mines; International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis; Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond; Michigan State University; University College London; College of Engineering, Michigan State University; University of East Anglia; University of Texas at Austin; University of Sussex; Research Councils UK; European Commission; Georgia Institute of Technology","keywords":"Novelty; Management science; Computer science; Rigour; Construct (python library); Data science; Quality (philosophy); Engineering ethics; Creativity; Style (visual arts); Research design; Psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Social science; Social psychology; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04616348,0.0001869355,0.0002835551,0.0004763598,0.003817902,0.000309745,0.001068338,0.0001638917,0.00007250539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005178886,0.0001669801,0.00003424908,0.004237775,0.02351578,0.001579135,0.001926352,0.0004065904,0.000003253177],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006452723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005088018,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004360446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001960375,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9924554,0.00154799,0.0003556692,0.00103976,0.002903236,0.001697925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977658,0.001167688,0.0001405201,0.0002554806,0.0002932122,0.0003772918],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002554014,0.0003627929,0.0004256493,0.00001950879,0.00001063339,0.000004774526,0.02046349,0.00006510587,0.515898,0.05722701,0.0002336547,0.4050339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002472538,0.003806081,0.06265556,0.00009979455,0.00002649075,0.00002858953,0.01061827,0.02425032,0.7502921,0.09390143,0.05072679,0.001122103],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8703917,0.000309218,0.02502591,0.003734408,0.0002405968,0.0009034763,0.00001519069,0.00006007572,0.09931941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9712532,0.0001462357,0.02777211,0.00009045077,0.0001976119,0.00009678713,9.838068e-7,0.00001961735,0.0004230354],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4039118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997479,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1241787942311161,"score_gpt":0.4818716216883832,"score_spread":0.357692827457267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}