{"id":"W2895336231","doi":"10.5194/nhess-19-313-2019","title":"Communicating disaster risk? An evaluation of the availability and quality of flood maps","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Natural hazards and earth system sciences","topic":"Flood Risk Assessment and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Marine Environmental Observation Prediction and Response Network","keywords":"Flood myth; Environmental planning; Disaster risk reduction; Quality (philosophy); Environmental resource management; Risk analysis (engineering); Geography; Risk assessment; Business; Computer science; Environmental science; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04450183,0.0003356203,0.0005839335,0.004728443,0.001760631,0.004996712,0.001001101,0.0007053938,0.002381529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1727917,0.0002474187,0.0006229737,0.004522836,0.002236359,0.003193374,0.002824423,0.0008911824,0.0001823378],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00906494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01263278,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1488071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1950543,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9597734,0.01644479,0.00328224,0.0007108102,0.01830106,0.001487663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7983024,0.1130029,0.02146158,0.005896548,0.05534365,0.005993011],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001859531,0.0007392183,0.6711933,0.001668182,0.0004101701,0.0004926195,0.06024965,0.003840769,0.001092066,0.003936168,0.005862,0.2486563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000173485,0.001588923,0.8263457,0.001876365,0.0004621569,0.0002492179,0.1190538,0.01287532,0.003799484,0.003476695,0.02980656,0.0002922234],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9690086,0.0004280845,0.003865032,0.002068645,0.00005449191,0.000715399,0.001210339,0.00009142368,0.02255781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960138,0.0001921548,0.002990254,0.00005413125,0.000008468634,0.0001357308,0.0002102525,0.000006789278,0.0003885348],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1488071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2958818,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0300482976765112,"score_gpt":0.3016297150305318,"score_spread":0.2715814173540206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}