{"id":"W2895796529","doi":"10.3758/s13428-018-1147-z","title":"The reliability of attentional biases for emotional images measured using a free-viewing eye-tracking paradigm","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Behavior Research Methods","topic":"Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes","field":"Psychology","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Attentional bias; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Fixation (population genetics); Eye tracking; Anxiety; Reliability (semiconductor); Eye movement; Audiology; Cognition; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Neuroscience","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004956722,0.0004338668,0.000347922,0.0006053518,0.0002836791,0.0005526988,0.0003856203,0.0006563443,0.00106648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0347187,0.0002818179,0.0003230885,0.0002785027,0.0004831577,0.000661728,0.0004492486,0.0008004549,0.000299459],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000276011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000245413,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00130934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001590397,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970478,0.0008958073,0.0002863317,0.0005597061,0.001080943,0.0001294782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9711325,0.01939524,0.003115096,0.002426517,0.003549479,0.0003812403],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01236405,0.001735682,0.6743933,0.0003887838,0.001451732,0.0001235324,0.003497458,0.001026145,0.1994143,0.000646792,0.0008915087,0.1040667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001148565,0.00126654,0.9873713,0.00002832456,0.0001703031,0.0002680415,0.0001930982,0.001643323,0.008372249,0.0001988353,0.0003484346,0.00002472754],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930272,0.0004707589,0.003550654,0.00003921829,0.00008168128,0.0001095121,0.00008716672,0.00002925776,0.002604553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981036,0.0001004802,0.001081698,0.00007966328,0.00003081189,0.00006852228,0.0001167321,0.00001613063,0.0004024241],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004956722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02621394,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5472372277828504,"score_gpt":0.6384359538892672,"score_spread":0.09119872610641677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}