{"id":"W2895813998","doi":"10.1139/cgj-2018-0433","title":"Calibration of resistance factors for geotechnical seismic design","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Geotechnical engineering; Seismic analysis; Earthquake resistance; Resistance Factors; Engineering; Seismic resistance; Return period; Earthquake shaking table; Bridge (graph theory); Seismic loading; Earthquake resistant structures; Civil engineering; Structural engineering; Forensic engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004887147,0.0002278424,0.0003662524,0.0003890242,0.0001808196,0.00005484272,0.0004315293,0.0003658723,0.00008254898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004149151,0.0002168511,0.0002469262,0.0004883211,0.0001622129,0.0001348936,0.00001576161,0.0005216707,0.000005985373],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002646716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002151735,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000409527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004345775,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983775,0.00003207169,0.0005733804,0.000202927,0.0002224644,0.0005916249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985929,0.0001759716,0.00007732583,0.0003254631,0.0001770344,0.0006512762],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001393743,0.00001023178,0.000007254144,0.0000328524,0.00006565668,0.000008549295,0.00002728007,0.9829766,0.002800385,0.0003344246,0.01258033,0.00114253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002485707,0.0001346122,0.0001472063,0.00008358112,0.00006491732,0.00002959601,0.00002585183,0.9613429,0.006197912,0.001713581,0.02971072,0.0003005654],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009290021,0.0002156369,0.9892384,0.0004418183,0.0002535577,0.000196085,0.00004887713,0.000251855,0.00006371993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932346,0.00004509073,0.006145464,0.00007911272,0.0002851585,0.00001432319,0.000009938814,0.00005466693,0.0001315877],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9839447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.884293,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01486253953364966,"score_gpt":0.206368165800137,"score_spread":0.1915056262664873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}