{"id":"W2896070427","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2018-0119","title":"Partitioning and predicting forage biomass from total aboveground biomass of regenerating tree species using dimensional analyses","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Biomass (ecology); Odocoileus; Fencing; Exclosure; Forage; Tree allometry; Ungulate; Biology; Ecology; Basal area; Forest inventory; Environmental science; Habitat; Agronomy; Biomass partitioning; Forest management; Grazing","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007676636,0.000395115,0.0003439298,0.001726554,0.0003644392,0.0005627708,0.0003413855,0.0001705441,0.0004558016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001599978,0.0002537813,0.0004825967,0.0009734265,0.0001815823,0.0003300297,0.0004692108,0.0002237278,0.000131589],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004367143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003117729,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01709954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05499893,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999665,0.0001153538,0.00003323179,0.00009922628,0.00005773325,0.00002942846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993119,0.0003420819,0.0001047024,0.00007577339,0.0001243559,0.00004111137],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009213587,0.00007952841,0.9012679,0.00005308486,0.0001513382,0.00004699749,0.0002595093,0.02533368,0.009369647,0.0004253785,0.0003398416,0.06258097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001052598,0.00005844798,0.8437993,0.00001328112,0.00004027608,0.00009571322,0.0003302075,0.1511983,0.0025486,0.001209337,0.0006639852,0.00003200337],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9678894,0.00008042654,0.03059169,0.00001402354,0.000001926392,0.0000331595,0.0007093564,0.00007900374,0.000601005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9279044,0.00006378499,0.07022582,0.00001081941,0.000002913148,0.00008155526,0.001479723,0.00002176864,0.0002092862],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01709954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03399998,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08586924309764259,"score_gpt":0.3330590318523064,"score_spread":0.2471897887546638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}