{"id":"W2896507175","doi":"10.3138/ijcs.56.2017-0001","title":"Assessing the Promise of Secularism for a Diverse Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Secularism; Scrutiny; Neutrality; Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Sensibility; Variety (cybernetics); Political science; Law; Philosophy; Politics; Computer science; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01527877,0.0002120483,0.0003808309,0.0009614666,0.01765782,0.009245723,0.001566623,0.001496937,0.00357819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03411407,0.0001886722,0.0002175044,0.001588161,0.01856028,0.004211367,0.008468078,0.002839331,0.0002129401],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0484538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06801421,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7136428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8571475,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9916859,0.003117133,0.0001687501,0.0004696456,0.002452384,0.002106173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9804909,0.006519062,0.001401,0.001184133,0.007371969,0.003033091],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001666321,0.0001778029,0.115014,0.0001503131,0.0000391633,0.0005635532,0.33049,0.000627314,0.0008766574,0.4862801,0.004550249,0.06106419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002108007,0.0002788937,0.1030413,0.0005049961,0.00006678321,0.0001358475,0.782903,0.001481582,0.001086919,0.04117203,0.06923019,0.00007729587],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8202455,0.0005088713,0.0007976021,0.02701648,0.00005353226,0.00005337631,0.00006303198,0.000007402145,0.1512542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981139,0.0001335737,0.000201978,0.0003721146,0.00000492091,0.000005790994,0.000009630926,0.000002843874,0.001155348],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2863572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5760872,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1261347009132467,"score_gpt":0.4669340920301285,"score_spread":0.3407993911168817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}