{"id":"W2896810973","doi":"10.3968/10599","title":"Dialectical Thinking of Jurisprudence and Legal Philosophy: From the Understanding in the Chinese Context","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Dialectic; Epistemology; Meaning (existential); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Context (archaeology); Philosophy of law; Sociology; China; Legal formalism; Legal realism; Legal positivism; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Legal research; Comparative law; Black letter law; History; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003523035,0.0005691506,0.0004626604,0.00226755,0.004367936,0.006014068,0.0009998154,0.001679302,0.001337313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001753966,0.0002573355,0.0003303933,0.00256939,0.02622611,0.008519065,0.003030078,0.002374985,0.0001025589],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01398858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009371858,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03997466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02481452,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982883,0.001036354,0.00006416901,0.0001593645,0.0002986008,0.0001531502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999011,0.0006226858,0.00008735193,0.00005833362,0.0001167832,0.00010381],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006780819,0.00001469603,0.001180056,0.00008378454,0.000003786612,0.0002768947,0.1107296,0.0001218765,0.0001989106,0.8798535,0.0004438968,0.00708622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003145972,0.00006479596,0.01298305,0.0009886072,0.00004011664,0.0006463226,0.2188332,0.003783235,0.000773832,0.6604605,0.1013472,0.00004772727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5209203,0.03133891,0.02480337,0.06741545,0.0005430712,0.0001640344,0.00007394659,0.0000495055,0.3546915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879305,0.004764695,0.001881871,0.001148518,0.00009399732,0.00004788759,0.00001440208,0.000009563955,0.004108668],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03997466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1014947,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03777946895890979,"score_gpt":0.3105634757671756,"score_spread":0.2727840068082659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}