{"id":"W2897105848","doi":"10.3897/aca.1.e30282","title":"Comparison of eDNA and traditional troglofauna sampling methods","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ARPHA Conference Abstracts","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Iron Ore Company (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental DNA; Sampling (signal processing); Biology; Biomonitoring; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Environmental science; Zoology; Biodiversity","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002432259,0.0001304332,0.0002026253,0.00002358886,0.0001843854,0.00001833606,0.0001761012,0.00006030975,0.001877079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005594036,0.0001284601,0.00003364608,0.00006876847,0.001142005,0.0002063293,0.000192057,0.0001064645,0.0002832563],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004956895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003805924,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001319411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003078964,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989881,0.00004015673,0.0002443501,0.0002794768,0.0002427921,0.0002051101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994554,0.000152616,0.0001414285,0.0001488515,0.00000960338,0.00009213603],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003611212,0.0003084618,0.7817103,0.00001646924,0.00005112016,0.000002190973,0.002967867,0.0001159738,0.1413449,0.0006943704,0.001485842,0.07126644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001786472,0.0001569528,0.9459203,0.00001315342,0.00002062743,0.000003413014,0.0005262317,0.0001278096,0.04914398,0.001394111,0.002377715,0.0001370392],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9760115,0.00004710882,0.001296347,0.0001446918,0.0001054381,0.000105102,0.00002095456,0.00002004998,0.02224877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9136618,0.00002611003,0.08611495,0.00008122934,0.00002873305,0.000002861056,0.000006531785,0.000004653773,0.00007312897],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.16421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990354,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1560828748123646,"score_gpt":0.367738803957801,"score_spread":0.2116559291454364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}