{"id":"W2897182371","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2018.10.002","title":"A theoretical foundation for ecopsychology: Looking at ecofeminist epistemology","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Ideas in Psychology","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ecofeminism; Foundation (evidence); Ontology; Environmentalism; Epistemology; Natural (archaeology); Sociology; Environmental ethics; Ecology; Psychology; Philosophy; Political science; Biology; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005936182,0.0001526706,0.0001910073,0.00005794317,0.0001529251,0.00001067673,0.0002869689,0.0002191021,0.0341881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002151208,0.000154764,0.00006008672,0.0001651018,0.001867607,0.00007472669,0.0001370555,0.0001392244,0.001921743],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004994363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002103115,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006113746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003390332,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982606,0.0001603767,0.0003606473,0.0006675682,0.0001024346,0.000448352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991192,0.0001622861,0.00009242005,0.0004806473,0.000007147915,0.0001383469],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001141719,0.0008581686,0.634428,0.00001855589,0.00002051504,0.00001331917,0.002921943,0.00002161,0.004117883,0.1036034,0.07508857,0.1777663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001653195,0.0005235464,0.4447581,0.000004314581,0.000009067267,0.00008623122,0.000139019,0.0001590688,0.0002269274,0.4036058,0.148598,0.00023677],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8156121,0.00002154411,0.003773504,0.009185809,0.00132998,0.0005588653,0.000002281472,0.00003732002,0.1694786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861032,0.00001027345,0.004971971,0.006428864,0.000191268,0.0000808702,0.00001694703,0.0000196141,0.00217695],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3000024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988554,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01325070340024799,"score_gpt":0.3538380394236378,"score_spread":0.3405873360233898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}