{"id":"W2897421503","doi":"10.1155/2018/3984962","title":"A Ship Domain-Based Method of Determining Action Distances for Evasive Manoeuvres in Stand-On Situations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Advanced Transportation","topic":"Maritime Navigation and Safety","field":"Engineering","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Collision avoidance; Domain (mathematical analysis); Reduction (mathematics); Collision; Stability (learning theory); Moment (physics); Action (physics); Continuation; Computer science; Marine engineering; Cover (algebra); Engineering; Simulation; Mathematics; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000363521,0.0007569978,0.0006299551,0.0009176715,0.0004203385,0.0006905625,0.0008980206,0.0007584753,0.002903239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001577424,0.0003455229,0.0006613192,0.0004441894,0.0003415979,0.0005815421,0.0007991974,0.000829739,0.0007625493],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004502482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001061998,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003884836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003646517,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997942,0.00003437671,0.00001450552,0.00006156287,0.00007066205,0.00002470511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995302,0.0002055002,0.00005831235,0.00004441593,0.0001316828,0.00002994123],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001137232,0.0001145114,0.00254153,0.0002280366,0.00005809544,0.0001377033,0.0001750198,0.8324472,0.01504062,0.007270027,0.001304024,0.1405695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005876788,0.00002665279,0.000269299,0.000008159267,0.000005899395,0.00003828205,0.00002578126,0.9964436,0.001631,0.0007052058,0.0008309343,0.00000947767],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.009770744,0.0000625092,0.9885617,0.00002436151,0.00002496209,0.00004734565,0.00005154234,0.000319884,0.001136989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3458613,0.0001603053,0.6507241,0.00003498381,0.00002381711,0.0002247085,0.0002539351,0.000133859,0.002582933],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003884836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009712338,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02253762583554756,"score_gpt":0.3264244638574757,"score_spread":0.3038868380219281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}