{"id":"W2897536876","doi":"10.1111/add.14477","title":"Estimating alcohol‐attributable fractions for injuries based on data from emergency department and observational studies: a comparison of two methods","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Addiction","topic":"Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes","field":"Medicine","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Mental Health Research Canada; Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism","keywords":"Emergency department; Medicine; Population; Attributable risk; Observational study; Demography; Odds ratio; Alcohol consumption; Poison control; Environmental health; Alcohol; Internal medicine; Psychiatry; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2522794,0.00523712,0.01278247,0.02350197,0.0009687786,0.00518218,0.005023861,0.004598142,0.003583332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4912901,0.002926338,0.02969779,0.01492014,0.002639342,0.005983035,0.004449045,0.003248191,0.0005132212],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002636866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002221682,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003944566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003475143,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5387059,0.3829318,0.03670685,0.02303629,0.01761127,0.001007867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2981099,0.6177868,0.04799005,0.02648019,0.008491064,0.00114207],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01572113,0.0002703828,0.2525952,0.03061856,0.5993247,0.0003358844,0.001183346,0.00475947,0.0005123096,0.002212858,0.001556833,0.09090926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01806293,0.009618566,0.4338962,0.02293851,0.4341782,0.003300387,0.002229118,0.03453841,0.002031878,0.02491875,0.01257842,0.001708663],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2032726,0.3937449,0.3668025,0.00222579,0.002424306,0.0134453,0.01413251,0.001071385,0.002880656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7724985,0.03457173,0.1588158,0.001484325,0.001344024,0.02180414,0.007790726,0.0003601811,0.001330536],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2522794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9220726,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3522237068659038,"score_gpt":0.5225132866060184,"score_spread":0.1702895797401146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}