{"id":"W2897647360","doi":"10.1002/cpt.1255","title":"Innovation in Pharmacovigilance: Use of Artificial Intelligence in Adverse Event Case Processing","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","topic":"Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Pfizer (Canada); Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"Pfizer","keywords":"Pharmacovigilance; Adverse effect; Event (particle physics); Complex event processing; Adverse Event Reporting System; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Medicine; Pharmacology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002612612,0.0004205566,0.0007307272,0.0007619443,0.0002144323,0.00001642928,0.0004209513,0.0006344102,0.0009530546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001261513,0.0004382803,0.0001893458,0.002341479,0.001448912,0.0005777476,0.0001547386,0.002296079,0.0001463743],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002095536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004457772,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003878161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009809379,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942319,0.001221953,0.002743454,0.0007255774,0.0002251827,0.0008519745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968628,0.001385191,0.0008142,0.0002630981,0.0004723247,0.0002023642],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009540849,0.01192511,0.175078,0.0002880073,0.000986275,0.004675904,0.004489603,0.01654248,0.3228589,0.0009214235,0.005242953,0.4474505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009153518,0.001260014,0.01190486,0.0002307585,0.001647169,0.0007731207,0.001872399,0.4476111,0.2580249,0.002376079,0.2632882,0.001857855],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910942,0.0002607972,0.001270033,0.00183331,0.004112194,0.0009239522,0.00007084478,0.00009818914,0.0003364961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9671858,0.001124105,0.0006101811,0.02975641,0.00105678,0.00009494869,0.00002409599,0.00004713882,0.0001005476],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4455926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999602,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4092247310207464,"score_gpt":0.5705374598262889,"score_spread":0.1613127288055425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}