{"id":"W2897894482","doi":"10.1016/j.epsl.2018.09.022","title":"Ge and Si isotope signatures in rivers: A quantitative multi-proxy approach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Earth and Planetary Science Letters","topic":"Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"Institut Carnot PolyNat; Consortium of Universities for the Advancement of Hydrologic Science; Geological Society of America; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Weathering; Silicate; Biogeochemical cycle; Dissolution; Geology; Silicate minerals; Environmental chemistry; Geochemistry; Earth science; Mineralogy; Carbon cycle; Chemistry; Ecosystem; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004304659,0.0001547673,0.0001618425,0.0001666004,0.0003447545,0.0001182797,0.0002117492,0.00004396847,0.000520766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002876725,0.0001244215,0.0000206266,0.0004807298,0.001238505,0.0005062837,0.00002351975,0.0001681131,0.00005216233],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000001881263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002284757,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003222399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00233214,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986294,0.00004583301,0.0001536066,0.0004899091,0.000258334,0.000422935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995571,0.00006683636,0.00005027142,0.0001219528,0.00001435377,0.0001894722],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005967065,0.00001560569,0.9876775,0.00002223867,0.00001266238,0.00003255058,0.001027748,0.001204032,0.00454619,0.00001008767,0.0001842893,0.005207388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000336122,0.0001423778,0.8852792,0.00001373551,0.0000109526,0.00001870507,0.0006057231,0.1120574,0.0005390973,0.00003151264,0.0007492999,0.000215919],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963301,0.0004750362,0.00008528618,0.0005133072,0.00006741555,0.0001274349,0.00006774082,0.00001570521,0.002317909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882284,0.00004524388,0.009725307,0.001771538,0.00005007625,5.456804e-7,0.0001023806,0.000001273814,0.00007526828],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1108533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5702022,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01409094036348027,"score_gpt":0.209610347347162,"score_spread":0.1955194069836818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}