{"id":"W2898042533","doi":"10.1111/josl.12304","title":"The pragmatics of kin address: A sociolinguistic universal and its semantic affordances","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Sociolinguistics","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Honorific; Linguistics; Sociolinguistics; Sociology; Linguistic universal; Noun; Psychology; Theoretical linguistics; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003704392,0.000266455,0.0004431088,0.001653201,0.002738452,0.004748027,0.0005421123,0.0008291194,0.00263245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009315643,0.0004526305,0.0002051663,0.001161302,0.01287903,0.009428635,0.004148441,0.001126578,0.0002306197],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001316486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001153749,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001977298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002574469,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950643,0.003100579,0.0002976512,0.0005827972,0.0006419041,0.0003127848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951644,0.002783137,0.0007098305,0.0006706851,0.0004486042,0.0002234094],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008520472,0.00003879486,0.0167054,0.0003520063,0.00002783823,0.0005890536,0.3538902,0.0002677318,0.01049896,0.5767765,0.0005205414,0.04024776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000401014,0.0001858654,0.06614131,0.0003319139,0.0001033961,0.004456758,0.3322156,0.003731333,0.005452282,0.4963494,0.09085302,0.0001390146],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7691485,0.00150417,0.06816597,0.002956944,0.00007014846,0.00004412557,0.0000929895,0.0001531745,0.1578639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982041,0.00007028669,0.001247637,0.00002837492,0.000009096116,0.000006918759,0.000009794305,0.00001931244,0.0004044613],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004748027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01959097,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04120450716068477,"score_gpt":0.3073036382444314,"score_spread":0.2660991310837466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}