{"id":"W2898282736","doi":"10.1177/1609406918809167","title":"Revisiting a Boy Named Jim","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Qualitative Methods","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; York University","keywords":"Reflexivity; Narrative; Appropriation; Narrative inquiry; Qualitative research; Meaning (existential); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Literature; Art; Social science; Psychotherapist; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1177095,0.0001259051,0.0003431162,0.0003801794,0.0003560651,0.0001873117,0.0008719739,0.0001061977,0.0005750287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06615011,0.000105978,0.000249432,0.0004141231,0.001667226,0.000566337,0.0000971006,0.0005883813,0.00004038813],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000305691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006587675,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002874839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003089289,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9571136,0.03974232,0.0008553882,0.000179634,0.001761111,0.0003479481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793038,0.01272956,0.0008593452,0.0001131029,0.006734851,0.000259356],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001712611,0.00004348816,0.0000848011,0.000009836508,0.0002810425,0.0000255339,0.4227636,7.665649e-7,0.003146757,0.2962689,0.001346297,0.2758578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005849662,0.0002916415,0.0003221077,0.0002519132,0.00002234275,0.00001644826,0.2950035,0.00005690076,0.002761106,0.4022397,0.2982499,0.0001994744],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01141009,0.0005349038,0.8952934,0.0536898,0.002190457,0.0001146692,0.00001251885,0.00002141713,0.03673272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08112755,0.0002860126,0.9118152,0.0008835462,0.00435055,0.000003925657,0.000001153807,0.00001700628,0.001515115],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2969036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9417161,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8196726336766507,"score_gpt":0.7732359704538605,"score_spread":0.04643666322279016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}