{"id":"W2898563665","doi":"10.6000/1929-6029.2018.07.04.1","title":"A Simulation Based Evaluation of Sample Size Methods for Biomarker Studies","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Statistics in Medical Research","topic":"Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Cancer Institute","keywords":"Biomarker; Sample size determination; Statistical power; Type I and type II errors; Statistics; Nominal level; Sample (material); Computer science; Medicine; Oncology; Mathematics; Biology; Confidence interval; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1189703,0.0001207354,0.000616093,0.0005196202,0.00005399477,0.00002988121,0.0007522191,0.0001787124,0.001618795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9681892,0.00009544178,0.0001164225,0.0003970764,0.001032336,0.00007148965,0.0001447078,0.000526383,0.000002468754],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004030914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001149735,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001621894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002530987,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9849137,0.00596432,0.002328843,0.000237238,0.006242405,0.0003134894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1349354,0.8386326,0.0008842163,0.0002393245,0.02508769,0.0002207873],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001952725,0.0006423891,0.000451426,0.0001894608,0.000525315,0.00002279929,0.0003940453,0.0003634587,0.0002743959,0.08257243,0.002704898,0.9099067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00234526,0.0004044075,0.0004252172,0.0003842397,0.00005608197,0.000001648983,0.000116299,0.3314956,0.0005644287,0.6637038,0.0004485263,0.000054513],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.003888422,0.0001033457,0.9924554,0.001148356,0.001580479,0.000465465,0.0002261607,0.00000423374,0.0001281518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2062036,0.00005672369,0.7930478,0.00008207293,0.0005545832,0.00002724348,0.000001886275,0.00001722162,0.000008844811],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9098521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8960419701603737,"score_gpt":0.809772509734291,"score_spread":0.08626946042608263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}