{"id":"W2898731212","doi":"10.1093/llc/fqy051","title":"In defense of sandcastles: Research thinking through visualization in digital humanities","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Scholarship in the Humanities","topic":"Data Visualization and Analytics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Visualization; Interpretation (philosophy); Epistemology; Argument (complex analysis); Terminology; Information visualization; Discipline; Praxis; Ontology; Computer science; Data science; Humanities; Sociology; Social science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0232305,0.0007835247,0.0005403911,0.00382623,0.007490774,0.02099597,0.001698434,0.003603401,0.006060285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0450389,0.0006370191,0.0007981175,0.00245992,0.05490054,0.02243917,0.01234537,0.007059977,0.0007332269],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004855491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003601765,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002608625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002886541,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9795629,0.01755892,0.0004434222,0.0008760443,0.001125863,0.0004330082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9490561,0.0400495,0.001652131,0.005995956,0.002195874,0.001050464],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002501341,0.00001109142,0.0004530537,0.0001417523,0.00000762626,0.000228595,0.0931766,0.0003660696,0.0004734883,0.8912573,0.00378946,0.01006987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003030767,0.00004443922,0.0004791845,0.0008067228,0.00001995922,0.0006341936,0.07640564,0.003368672,0.001864729,0.6838138,0.232472,0.00006030158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1035762,0.01175505,0.473711,0.173412,0.00452703,0.0003787481,0.0001830595,0.001364879,0.2310921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9178199,0.002370861,0.06344802,0.002709553,0.0005345856,0.0002794787,0.00004868655,0.0003822772,0.01240658],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0232305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1228561,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1918952852916808,"score_gpt":0.3977230538410073,"score_spread":0.2058277685493266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}