{"id":"W2898748870","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2018-0128","title":"The transferability of airborne laser scanning based tree-level models between different inventory areas","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scots pine; Transferability; Diameter at breast height; Mean squared error; Forest inventory; Canopy; Mathematics; Laser scanning; Forestry; Tree (set theory); Statistics; Environmental science; Pinus <genus>; Geography; Botany; Forest management; Biology; Physics; Laser; Combinatorics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004895881,0.0006587628,0.000512665,0.000978556,0.0004388918,0.00141079,0.001214593,0.0007195543,0.0008401497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01025817,0.0004151482,0.001070766,0.0007753592,0.0005187189,0.001936656,0.00101959,0.0007264994,0.0004714958],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00103416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006537445,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01747308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009698506,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984339,0.0003986465,0.000101218,0.0006204913,0.0003216351,0.0001241474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930367,0.00404132,0.0005892354,0.001213058,0.0009763695,0.0001432887],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005324052,0.0002778393,0.1222499,0.00009992393,0.0004526149,0.0001789472,0.0004239623,0.767924,0.008337114,0.0008309419,0.0004499884,0.09824236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001673604,0.0001397113,0.02697058,0.00001468044,0.0000566925,0.00007853084,0.0001738646,0.9687025,0.002775172,0.0006031194,0.0004357641,0.00003260983],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9268885,0.0002253408,0.06941939,0.0001232831,0.00004797928,0.00007837181,0.0005446233,0.001249617,0.001422941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838521,0.00006064574,0.01495952,0.0000302882,0.000009005146,0.00003182782,0.000666728,0.00007526488,0.0003146021],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01747308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03474271,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09870420788860107,"score_gpt":0.3104016683235871,"score_spread":0.2116974604349861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}