{"id":"W2898802295","doi":"10.1111/jofo.12270","title":"Efficiency and fitness consequences of two trapping methods for recapturing ground‐nesting songbirds","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Field Ornithology","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Nest (protein structural motif); Trap (plumbing); Trapping; Population; Mark and recapture; Biology; Ecology; Zoology; Geography; Demography; Meteorology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002077705,0.0004484062,0.0002696303,0.0008470208,0.0005661951,0.0006750803,0.0005634774,0.000434025,0.0005603987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003610683,0.0002461192,0.0005096916,0.0002847896,0.0004788782,0.0004606349,0.0006105175,0.000345401,0.0001374563],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001242356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003549676,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01962559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1130236,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982885,0.0005131761,0.0002021488,0.0003650735,0.0004383536,0.0001928057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948827,0.00138403,0.002195215,0.0004527427,0.0007637776,0.0003214657],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005590936,0.0003988963,0.9586929,0.00008757688,0.0003987721,0.0001278234,0.0005157744,0.0009215057,0.01613651,0.00003185505,0.00009677944,0.0220325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006256528,0.0004997585,0.9973884,0.0000051993,0.00004683379,0.00009929219,0.0001571431,0.0005634542,0.001140054,0.000005256124,0.00008182195,0.00000651963],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995134,0.00006637335,0.000168188,0.000008119637,0.000001468266,0.00001599732,0.00004262796,0.000002948499,0.000181048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981736,0.00008176283,0.001093792,0.00002340081,0.000004416711,0.00003298144,0.0001671392,0.000004745987,0.0004180859],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01962559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03902268,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04047610232343116,"score_gpt":0.3726828883147143,"score_spread":0.3322067859912831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}