{"id":"W2899136400","doi":"10.1177/0040517518809044","title":"Knowledge mapping of protective clothing research—a bibliometric analysis based on visualization methodology","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Textile Research Journal","topic":"Textile materials and evaluations","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai","keywords":"Clothing; Visualization; Centrality; China; Field (mathematics); Computer science; Data science; Geography; Archaeology; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.06761706,0.0001614028,0.000498176,0.1139548,0.001514166,0.0005039203,0.0007878128,0.0001704515,0.008375625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01409542,0.0001327914,0.0001698067,0.1444853,0.000932306,0.0003534107,0.0002829666,0.0007561313,0.0007090626],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003934768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008399922,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002163996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000539981,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9835052,0.01174618,0.0007788512,0.0004913216,0.002473023,0.001005462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886643,0.003962676,0.0003219008,0.0005397531,0.006222664,0.0002887475],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003623189,0.0004981266,0.0005146703,0.0001053733,0.0001386558,0.0000117412,0.003680275,0.001114063,0.9684486,0.00303248,0.002807771,0.01928586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001993329,0.004754015,0.08434529,0.0005968847,0.0001840235,0.00004619349,0.003515204,0.15087,0.726315,0.02055977,0.006246652,0.0005736503],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8754115,0.0002082856,0.1171869,0.0002389366,0.0004493475,0.0006881773,0.00003068493,0.00005593343,0.005730256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936504,0.0000422611,0.005241474,0.00001931134,0.0007333964,0.0000729531,0.000005701994,0.00003016839,0.0002042995],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2421337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997857,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5233630635473551,"score_gpt":0.5641113615535336,"score_spread":0.04074829800617852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}