{"id":"W2899308152","doi":"10.2166/wh.2018.108","title":"Assessing high-throughput environmental DNA extraction methods for meta-barcode characterization of aquatic microbial communities","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Water and Health","topic":"Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Environmental DNA; DNA extraction; Environmentally friendly; Metagenomics; Extraction (chemistry); Lysis; Microbial population biology; Chromatography; Biology; Chemistry; Polymerase chain reaction; Bacteria; Ecology; Biodiversity; Biochemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009188234,0.0001152909,0.0003458573,0.00004715305,0.0003587971,0.00002928473,0.0001071076,0.00004061614,0.0003119515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003778295,0.00008104683,0.00008876325,0.00002491903,0.0003823771,0.0005903406,0.0001217064,0.0001004864,0.000007534597],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001937889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000448173,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000215594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001918046,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989547,0.0001912179,0.0004203316,0.00009610665,0.0001530702,0.0001845482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993939,0.00005292224,0.0003917257,0.00009228546,0.000004990649,0.00006417054],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006041586,0.0001749095,0.02887156,0.00005309234,0.0002145801,5.385313e-7,0.006466559,0.000007088048,0.9501496,0.000003316455,0.0002213884,0.01377697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001070558,0.001402555,0.555937,0.00004503893,0.0005176159,0.00006427702,0.002669289,0.0001634274,0.4297394,0.0004167954,0.007757418,0.0002166579],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9752085,0.00008164189,0.02335518,0.0009554574,0.0001941079,0.0001607593,0.00002138641,0.000003372185,0.00001960005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9092118,0.0003828226,0.08990036,0.0003461383,0.00007786005,0.000002829898,0.00002329504,0.000008158951,0.00004677627],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5270655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.341565,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09361881021762115,"score_gpt":0.3609467482632189,"score_spread":0.2673279380455977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}