{"id":"W2899898427","doi":"10.1139/cgj-2018-0038","title":"Assessing characteristic value selection methods for design with load and resistance factor design (LRFD) — design robustness perspective","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Robustness (evolution); Engineering; Factor of safety; Safety factor; Structural engineering; Selection (genetic algorithm); Load factor; Reliability engineering; Geotechnical engineering; Civil engineering; Computer science; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00147469,0.0003423251,0.0004407348,0.0003488491,0.0004926278,0.0004185893,0.0002579436,0.0003064104,0.00003686637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007854287,0.0003090966,0.00009092073,0.0006422056,0.0001578412,0.0003444552,0.00001226668,0.0007419877,0.000002667823],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001345026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007180154,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000386609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001973663,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980391,0.0002497245,0.0003745301,0.0003739972,0.0002155302,0.0007471508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978624,0.0005201375,0.00009358892,0.0002113878,0.0005438032,0.0007686577],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007368172,0.00001158142,0.000002490208,0.00003285376,0.0001796753,0.00002820516,0.0000838958,0.9813252,0.007379176,0.0002129095,0.0005352186,0.0101351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004008811,0.0002827375,0.0003484997,0.0001805515,0.0001749638,0.0002930035,0.00007948916,0.9928553,0.002190351,0.001149281,0.001548248,0.0004967611],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005084624,0.0005016629,0.9978828,0.0002860613,0.0001463577,0.0003731354,0.000007624551,0.0002641983,0.00002967696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4026155,0.00004723979,0.596847,0.00004640719,0.0002734784,0.0000411867,0.000001032092,0.00007351009,0.00005460768],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4021071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999361,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0322976752426476,"score_gpt":0.2878394579070845,"score_spread":0.2555417826644369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}