{"id":"W2899953331","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000414","title":"Assessing the utility of drug screening in the emergency: a short report","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Open Quality","topic":"Healthcare cost, quality, practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Observational study; Emergency department; False positive paradox; Drug; Addiction; Complaint; Medical emergency; Emergency medicine; Family medicine; Psychiatry; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1469684,0.0002353943,0.0006718851,0.00006330241,0.001803918,0.00009566241,0.001969441,0.0002202348,0.001622514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02099684,0.0001410861,0.0001237532,0.0008520736,0.0004031574,0.001283744,0.001217652,0.001589678,0.00007946749],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000780965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001744696,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06751426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03807067,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9573348,0.036172,0.003760749,0.0007019509,0.001220339,0.0008101549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866712,0.006428865,0.002555065,0.003173107,0.001009971,0.0001617808],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001459688,0.00018046,0.9331645,0.0004094118,0.00003234958,0.0000252709,0.02858604,1.401255e-7,0.00003037196,0.002253296,0.01510249,0.02006966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002367992,0.00002303951,0.9060945,0.000271893,0.00002198641,0.00001145846,0.06536774,0.0001392842,0.00003213501,0.002559495,0.02504496,0.0001967084],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8698944,0.00007802387,0.00104708,0.03712974,0.0009981759,0.006085667,0.00002346976,0.00004315641,0.08470026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916637,0.00001384964,0.001390186,0.00489711,0.000576795,0.0006860748,0.00002205452,0.00002501004,0.0007252352],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1259715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994956,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8924210032250872,"score_gpt":0.7254612690622477,"score_spread":0.1669597341628395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}