{"id":"W2900178859","doi":"10.1177/2043820618797775","title":"Not Chinese exceptionalism, but comparative institutionalism!","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialogues in Human Geography","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Exceptionalism; Centrality; Institutionalism; Globalization; Argument (complex analysis); Positive economics; State (computer science); Sociology; Political science; American exceptionalism; Neoclassical economics; Economic system; Law and economics; Epistemology; Economics; Politics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003883489,0.0002670715,0.0003298412,0.000557675,0.0005558265,0.0002681763,0.0003529007,0.0001184008,0.0002161481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001195399,0.000246776,0.0002191479,0.001022879,0.001060889,0.001040364,0.0001411685,0.0001832281,0.0001502954],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006146273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002597443,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00475719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001789511,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984295,0.00003751585,0.0003634381,0.0003774823,0.0003533664,0.0004387413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991806,0.00004305333,0.0001434265,0.0002461171,0.0003587651,0.00002804722],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006277133,0.0003794651,0.8144519,0.00006531712,0.00004715802,0.00001178455,0.002178961,0.00003379619,0.00006470566,0.1812437,0.001339535,0.0001208802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006164439,0.00002652317,0.8783913,0.00002242406,0.00002227409,4.803732e-7,0.001118075,0.00003720297,0.000006413574,0.1095317,0.009922628,0.0003045345],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9510623,0.00006811715,0.00002809985,0.0002385388,0.0007080394,0.0003275741,0.0000433983,0.0001481262,0.04737584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936329,0.00000428095,0.00003849887,0.00204434,0.003732736,0.00003097994,0.0004702213,0.00001348091,0.00003255843],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07171198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999985,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04785784115284107,"score_gpt":0.3083137438576409,"score_spread":0.2604559027047998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}