{"id":"W2900409145","doi":"","title":"SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT IN URBAN PLANNING. A CHALLENGE FOR A METHODOLOGICAL CONSTRUCTION: MONTREAL AS CASE STUDY","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"On the Waterfront","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Plan (archaeology); Process (computing); Urban sustainability; Inclusion (mineral); Sustainable development; Process management; Environmental planning; Key (lock); Urban planning; Management science; Business; Sociology; Environmental resource management; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Civil engineering; Geography; Environmental science; Social science; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006729612,0.0005612593,0.0003435123,0.001724813,0.006695108,0.004628692,0.002152777,0.001332283,0.003881289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007107036,0.0002708792,0.0002977145,0.005554074,0.008963863,0.001961549,0.002590263,0.0009697492,0.0001601839],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07701168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03947107,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9096118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9568061,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9939912,0.004050585,0.00009233454,0.0003078209,0.001029352,0.0005287188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972222,0.001332432,0.0002205006,0.000182343,0.0006698165,0.0003727928],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001178462,0.0002792343,0.02078097,0.001190383,0.00009488693,0.003810739,0.07271817,0.01968663,0.003589466,0.6844338,0.03662982,0.1566681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009151786,0.0002694622,0.04692061,0.001042226,0.00009613902,0.0007948845,0.1570093,0.01462471,0.003110772,0.05597978,0.7197811,0.000279594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4330601,0.02533757,0.06351216,0.08679934,0.000537527,0.003118167,0.002337464,0.0004166237,0.384881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.935081,0.003553956,0.03841427,0.001137065,0.00005268902,0.0007229215,0.0002146091,0.00006646531,0.0207569],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09038824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5587615,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1456215795049643,"score_gpt":0.400480908354804,"score_spread":0.2548593288498398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}