{"id":"W2900409145","doi":"","title":"SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT IN URBAN PLANNING. A CHALLENGE FOR A METHODOLOGICAL CONSTRUCTION: MONTREAL AS CASE STUDY","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"On the Waterfront","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Plan (archaeology); Process (computing); Urban sustainability; Inclusion (mineral); Sustainable development; Process management; Environmental planning; Key (lock); Urban planning; Management science; Business; Sociology; Environmental resource management; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Civil engineering; Geography; Environmental science; Social science; Ecology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003680319,0.0001220476,0.0002664989,0.00003157495,0.0008284957,0.0000558566,0.0001644507,0.00007960132,0.00004226126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009122664,0.00007503347,0.00007466206,0.00007694427,0.0003444914,0.00004278827,0.00005244395,0.000179375,0.000003239672],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005330819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000108104,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02696826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02273278,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973533,0.001593581,0.0002001176,0.0002728972,0.0002338944,0.0003462361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984736,0.001130817,0.00006377234,0.0001719844,0.00009218389,0.00006762355],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001871605,0.001141776,0.02688339,0.00002111558,0.0001026598,0.0003439907,0.4277958,0.00005916733,0.000001041552,0.5144411,0.004017462,0.0250053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001531045,0.002274448,0.01872205,0.00001672296,0.00004715772,0.00001298736,0.646677,0.0002595718,0.000005037391,0.2735858,0.05654834,0.0003198305],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9345126,0.000174224,0.0006807744,0.01348834,0.0004727647,0.001910641,0.000003437234,0.0000673086,0.04868988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980248,0.00001009184,0.0003921828,0.0001075569,0.0003078996,0.0003754999,5.928037e-7,0.000005764942,0.0007756529],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2408554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950998,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1456215795049643,"score_gpt":0.400480908354804,"score_spread":0.2548593288498398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}