{"id":"W2901104421","doi":"10.1177/1048291118810900","title":"Causality Advocacy: Workers’ Compensation Cases as Resources for Identifying and Preventing Diseases of Modernity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NEW SOLUTIONS A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy","topic":"Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Compensation (psychology); Causality (physics); Public health; Environmental health; Audit; Business; Relevance (law); Public relations; Political science; Medicine; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Accounting","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002179175,0.00007562834,0.0001287273,0.00006553128,0.0002983208,0.000012834,0.00004109291,0.00003677476,0.00001236595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005354863,0.00007248658,0.00006074682,0.00003046083,0.0001521747,0.00001321545,0.00007306413,0.00003885548,3.009379e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005131277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003211131,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006174624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001273633,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992345,0.00005753319,0.0003091041,0.0001152884,0.0001317709,0.0001518176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993982,0.00003773606,0.0003156922,0.00006646194,0.00003136467,0.0001505955],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00307745,0.001254882,0.6842409,0.0005451387,0.0004776288,0.000003773443,0.004258194,0.0003524869,0.2246193,0.001699613,0.003937534,0.07553308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007889785,0.001024683,0.9931048,0.00005202534,0.00003516456,0.00009918558,0.0006380012,0.00009846619,0.001484441,0.0008156524,0.001776384,0.00008227034],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926301,0.002300615,0.004142483,0.0005400304,0.00003437862,0.0001563663,0.0001835844,0.000001122608,0.00001134086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971766,0.0003853556,0.001621922,0.000247554,0.0004726917,0.000002943672,0.00003513524,0.000005587317,0.00005213767],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3088638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2955917,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05311018770692388,"score_gpt":0.3801673481204109,"score_spread":0.327057160413487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}