{"id":"W2901282154","doi":"10.1017/cls.2018.24","title":"Statute-Based Protections for Research Participant Confidentiality: Implications of the US Experience for Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law and Society / Revue Canadienne Droit et Société","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Confidentiality; Strengths and weaknesses; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Statute of limitations; Business; Psychology; Social psychology; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":{"n_in":3,"stratum":"about_only","weight":3321.24,"opus":{"tier":"T2","genre":"conceptual","about_ca":true,"confidence":"medium","reason":"Comparative legal analysis of statute-based protections for research participant confidentiality, drawing lessons from US instruments for the Canadian context; the object is how research is governed and regulated in Canada, which is research policy analysis (a reasonable coder could call this core T1)."},"gpt":{"tier":"T2","genre":"policy","about_ca":true,"confidence":"medium","reason":"The paper analyzes legal protections governing research participants and their application to the Canadian research context."},"grok":{"tier":"T1","genre":"conceptual","about_ca":true,"confidence":"high","reason":"Analyzes statute-based legal protections for research participant confidentiality, comparing US models for Canadian research governance."}},"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07566786,0.0003908766,0.001228211,0.003029687,0.04597064,0.01805409,0.005116229,0.007055252,0.006896872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1302095,0.0008439613,0.001079321,0.008661148,0.01944392,0.00552895,0.009394493,0.01053315,0.0003367118],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.3045706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.6533443,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9957722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983363,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9200093,0.02943997,0.003693022,0.003523873,0.02341028,0.0199236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7669661,0.1052888,0.007319117,0.005832188,0.07531563,0.03927824],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006659583,0.0003012638,0.05331958,0.001287619,0.0001511031,0.004142203,0.3289617,0.001425025,0.001230874,0.4142978,0.09967124,0.09454574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002097583,0.0003004739,0.05664044,0.003787757,0.0002196904,0.001194802,0.4703436,0.001864915,0.001360873,0.03282939,0.4305325,0.000715751],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2288235,0.0110443,0.004848115,0.618849,0.001878124,0.0007999213,0.0009332406,0.00008129644,0.1327425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9251661,0.007180817,0.00411089,0.04845411,0.0001694397,0.0002934328,0.0002032391,0.00006996785,0.01435208],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9929448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3482748374690408,"score_gpt":0.5115846220478356,"score_spread":0.1633097845787948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}