{"id":"W2901394030","doi":"10.1111/gean.12178","title":"A Shape‐Based Local Spatial Association Measure (LISShA): A Case Study in Maritime Anomaly Detection","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Geographical Analysis","topic":"Spatial and Panel Data Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Metric (unit); Context (archaeology); Anomaly (physics); Spatial contextual awareness; Spatial analysis; Association (psychology); Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Geography; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001855674,0.0002405209,0.0007998872,0.002362886,0.0002505929,0.0001609249,0.000234733,0.000265305,0.002152773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003142825,0.0002625795,0.0006391121,0.006729583,0.00009620044,0.0001958414,0.00006771846,0.0002971666,0.0002504537],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001764094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001683205,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1635478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3973503,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974219,0.0001518769,0.000922458,0.0008384938,0.0002227281,0.0004425099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985919,0.0001153283,0.0004134086,0.0004971471,0.0002258634,0.0001563582],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006099651,0.000506177,0.9900565,0.000004838068,0.001318882,0.0002577501,0.0001364835,0.0003009569,0.000003256288,0.00004921883,0.0000160448,0.007288928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008512714,0.0002634178,0.5988033,0.000002903484,0.0009243216,0.00001007665,0.0002090943,0.3978715,0.000008476858,0.0004184701,0.0003319919,0.000305199],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9214441,0.00008529076,0.077069,0.0003585056,0.00009585892,0.0002178027,0.0002203031,0.00005391434,0.0004552735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992477,0.000007816619,0.0001019263,0.0001908127,0.0001851526,0.00005713563,0.0001250687,0.00001591103,0.00006845996],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3975705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999827,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02062204051761254,"score_gpt":0.2242362891878606,"score_spread":0.2036142486702481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}