{"id":"W2901461907","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.08.123","title":"Radial artery versus saphenous vein as the second conduit for coronary artery bypass surgery: A meta-analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","topic":"Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques","field":"Medicine","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Sciences Centre; University of Toronto; Sunnybrook Health Science Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Coronary artery bypass surgery; Cardiology; Perioperative; Internal medicine; Odds ratio; Myocardial infarction; Confidence interval; Meta-analysis; Revascularization; Radial artery; Artery; Stroke (engine); Surgery","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002347552,0.001755254,0.006496958,0.001014884,0.0003450785,0.001763504,0.001278587,0.001700546,0.005858145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00556412,0.000717167,0.01829302,0.001673424,0.0003413912,0.001067856,0.0006525379,0.002499462,0.0005245914],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006552896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007280802,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002844935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009183666,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998635,0.0004671379,0.0003392239,0.0003138254,0.0001376437,0.0001071091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970619,0.002099021,0.0004900012,0.0001113929,0.0001590613,0.00007862219],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01643931,0.0001351872,0.0147798,0.1292093,0.8071721,0.0002990317,0.0001053595,0.0005617126,0.0007632216,0.0003189007,0.001686939,0.02852915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002103046,0.000433347,0.007612824,0.004646529,0.9823564,0.0001225385,0.00006835874,0.0001718876,0.000134929,0.0003232337,0.001995896,0.00003102592],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01860312,0.9793174,0.0005434509,0.0002243857,0.000360422,0.00005279333,0.0003727852,0.00001525505,0.0005103623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3791667,0.613834,0.001607766,0.002118043,0.0008265085,0.0001773647,0.0008330235,0.0000495318,0.00138694],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006496958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01959747,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1140697289788394,"score_gpt":0.3528813508473144,"score_spread":0.238811621868475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}