{"id":"W2901644990","doi":"10.1590/1809-2950/17004225032018","title":"Dynamic Movement Assessment and Functional Movement Screening for injury prediction: a systematic review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Fisioterapia e Pesquisa","topic":"Sports injuries and prevention","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro","keywords":"Medicine; CINAHL; Functional movement; Physical therapy; Musculoskeletal injury; MEDLINE; Diagnostic odds ratio; Relative risk; Scopus; Odds ratio; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Meta-analysis; Internal medicine; Confidence interval; Psychological intervention; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001467605,0.0006525902,0.003042604,0.0002753639,0.0002690982,0.0000785001,0.0001383712,0.0003127955,0.0009395444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008399264,0.0004878097,0.0009686353,0.0002493908,0.00006939596,0.0001095245,0.000149077,0.0003692731,0.00001995368],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005188696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000286874,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005795608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002198344,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960314,0.0001549345,0.001889674,0.0008241123,0.0007096425,0.0003902386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975699,0.0001510847,0.0009903716,0.0008262197,0.0002484157,0.0002140417],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003749534,0.0001024328,0.000008385363,0.905528,0.001014008,0.000005119973,0.00001652382,9.59914e-8,4.516005e-7,0.0001168971,0.01735773,0.07581285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004393951,0.0006997549,0.00008915357,0.5728482,0.006804629,0.00004612722,0.000008658629,0.0001705923,1.788116e-7,0.0001219355,0.418483,0.0002884405],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.000003699608,0.9784824,0.008888446,0.0003501729,0.0009312489,0.01053998,0.000572782,0.00009692746,0.0001342994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000002313607,0.9828823,0.005175945,0.002025902,0.0004989319,0.003181594,0.002589585,0.00009339491,0.003550066],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4011252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999737,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03995476799881722,"score_gpt":0.3771118223914854,"score_spread":0.3371570543926682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}