{"id":"W2901644990","doi":"10.1590/1809-2950/17004225032018","title":"Dynamic Movement Assessment and Functional Movement Screening for injury prediction: a systematic review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Fisioterapia e Pesquisa","topic":"Sports injuries and prevention","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro","keywords":"Medicine; CINAHL; Functional movement; Physical therapy; Musculoskeletal injury; MEDLINE; Diagnostic odds ratio; Relative risk; Scopus; Odds ratio; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Meta-analysis; Internal medicine; Confidence interval; Psychological intervention; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01072529,0.001761694,0.009388935,0.01062977,0.0006485744,0.003167293,0.002168337,0.002023559,0.004395797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05746756,0.00126448,0.008850688,0.01132591,0.001001428,0.002751199,0.001467153,0.001391314,0.0003524695],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004244962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01275219,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01030183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02291523,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9886534,0.004268249,0.003674415,0.0007980065,0.002346921,0.0002591338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9498527,0.03885058,0.007140852,0.0006191315,0.003212563,0.0003241863],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001430196,0.00001616072,0.0008874809,0.9694463,0.007856783,0.00004632555,0.0001095885,0.00008237318,0.00005616339,0.0001235574,0.000682138,0.02055009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002324843,0.0001818446,0.004730941,0.9164622,0.07090962,0.0002572753,0.0002167625,0.0001788973,0.0001152871,0.0002289223,0.006447378,0.0000383453],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001116224,0.9974705,0.0001840282,0.0001639489,0.00006553309,0.0004541163,0.0003412127,0.000008841072,0.0001956813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031343,0.9649976,0.00121111,0.0004214324,0.00009599124,0.001447181,0.0003454271,0.000007338607,0.000131029],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01072529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05672145,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03995476799881722,"score_gpt":0.3771118223914854,"score_spread":0.3371570543926682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}