{"id":"W2902078639","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025007","title":"Formalisation and subordination: a contingency theory approach to optimising primary care teams","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ Open","topic":"Interprofessional Education and Collaboration","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Quebec Rehabilitation Research Network; Université de Montréal; University of Victoria","funders":"Institute of Health Services and Policy Research; Institute of Population and Public Health; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Medicine; Subordination (linguistics); Primary care; Contingency; Contingency theory; Health services research; Nursing; Public health; Family medicine; Epistemology; Knowledge management","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007233298,0.0004911838,0.0003790612,0.002990772,0.002511606,0.004725971,0.001420029,0.0009625761,0.002565203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01076516,0.0003467242,0.0008282113,0.001810246,0.01501566,0.003057741,0.003414838,0.001543251,0.0001544228],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009748461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01098902,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01297471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01493948,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9919651,0.006084205,0.0002301736,0.0004370216,0.0008156346,0.0004680813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862171,0.009087576,0.001672944,0.0007008337,0.001280877,0.001040566],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001189812,0.0002051266,0.03404082,0.0007650768,0.0001315209,0.0007338222,0.0660321,0.02788141,0.0004973012,0.8071084,0.00258797,0.0598974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009650741,0.0003082905,0.03071418,0.001360133,0.00009743358,0.0005561963,0.07459011,0.05788518,0.0004697257,0.8086269,0.02520153,0.00009388468],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3028984,0.004547385,0.5251549,0.02032411,0.000322818,0.001129655,0.0001912743,0.0001639259,0.1452676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9604089,0.0004438074,0.03769899,0.0002202689,0.00002999629,0.0002694602,0.00003146172,0.00001024528,0.0008869052],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01297471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07073033,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08233258048776634,"score_gpt":0.5036409431453359,"score_spread":0.4213083626575695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}