{"id":"W2902178268","doi":"10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.021","title":"Is the environmental opportunity of retrofitting the residential sector worth the life cycle cost? A consequential assessment of a typical house in Quebec","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews","topic":"Environmental Impact and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Retrofitting; Life-cycle assessment; Single-family detached home; Engineering; Environmental economics; Life-cycle cost analysis; Architectural engineering; Economics; Geography; Reliability engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002659288,0.000251178,0.0004703123,0.0000381546,0.0005030373,0.00005897701,0.0005133527,0.0001021831,0.001597585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003079701,0.000130869,0.0001755335,0.0003672158,0.00200494,0.0002719306,0.0007462163,0.0002246148,0.000004298213],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003960799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001792033,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09299397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01758902,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969441,0.0008702588,0.0007840313,0.0003732559,0.0004306801,0.0005977334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983786,0.0002208998,0.0004139156,0.0008042214,0.00001353487,0.0001687889],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008670451,0.001855297,0.890972,0.0007017951,0.0002814658,0.00009255282,0.01139219,0.003926203,0.009124885,0.005118835,0.02433257,0.05133518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001703988,0.0007264258,0.5633355,0.0001497329,0.0002820362,0.00003037563,0.02420598,0.004162348,0.005110808,0.003288326,0.3963261,0.000678375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923086,0.002456354,0.0003397369,0.001282856,0.00005634279,0.001018652,0.000008747524,0.0000114914,0.002517262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906518,0.003075708,0.00007196331,0.0009067178,0.00007200707,0.0001006198,0.000004091148,0.00002235445,0.005094699],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3719935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993151,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01955746081723446,"score_gpt":0.2728809171342779,"score_spread":0.2533234563170434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}