{"id":"W2902386729","doi":"10.1093/wjaf/15.3.129","title":"Cold Hardiness Testing for Douglas-Fir Tree Improvement Programs: Guidelines for a Simple, Robust, and Inexpensive Screening Method","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Applied Forestry","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Hardiness (plants); Douglas fir; Computer science; Forestry; Biology; Horticulture; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008573261,0.0002387633,0.0003805972,0.00005707662,0.0002157709,0.00007476936,0.000294328,0.0001108528,0.00006543858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008425664,0.0001984004,0.0001148075,0.0001304665,0.0001211618,0.0002179898,0.0001383586,0.000152284,0.000004800106],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006020292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002027138,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002817278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001273552,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983028,0.00001475568,0.0007121933,0.0003143485,0.0002302836,0.0004256394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989207,0.0002118021,0.000437997,0.0001754695,0.0001011823,0.0001528089],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001956098,0.0003113263,0.04828104,0.0002422809,0.0003502751,0.00003752001,0.0003697347,0.09435726,0.004364842,0.001488977,0.01286654,0.8353741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04153297,0.01549459,0.2603894,0.0008771226,0.002095671,0.0006732845,0.004632798,0.09823056,0.01132298,0.07634518,0.4848068,0.003598634],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.7057953,0.00006832692,0.2890135,0.0008585198,0.0002014351,0.002489823,0.00001654354,0.00004558523,0.001510995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4216255,0.00001793444,0.5751473,0.001588113,0.0005422957,0.0004449399,0.00001539433,0.00005786688,0.0005606129],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8317755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8090532,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05579189531206381,"score_gpt":0.303900405764855,"score_spread":0.2481085104527912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}