{"id":"W2902685743","doi":"10.7717/peerj.5950","title":"A ghost fence-gap: surprising wildlife usage of an obsolete fence crossing","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PeerJ","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Fence (mathematics); Wildlife; Fencing; Biological dispersal; Habitat; Geography; Wildlife corridor; Ecology; Engineering; Computer science; Population; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004638966,0.0001057687,0.0001371368,0.0000259008,0.0004192798,0.00005776225,0.0002630871,0.00008510424,0.00103074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000157177,0.0001053521,0.000035367,0.0002287155,0.000958645,0.0005208442,0.0001204076,0.00009875157,0.0003940833],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000608266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003427487,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009777575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008446545,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989099,0.00007325954,0.0002201004,0.0002937186,0.0002371297,0.0002658971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994013,0.00007156171,0.0001304792,0.0002905084,0.00002251198,0.00008360478],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003334212,0.00007221568,0.9641213,0.000005997179,0.000005885252,0.000007486329,0.001657663,0.0000871204,0.02140393,0.00007312353,0.002221815,0.01031009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001837398,0.0001353973,0.9868915,0.00002061601,0.000009604403,0.00001100742,0.0000893198,0.002279141,0.004289354,0.0006143744,0.005332241,0.0001436762],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907465,0.000009985972,0.0009445315,0.0006424691,0.0002387851,0.00009339588,0.000004252894,0.00004176606,0.007278341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946447,0.000001993287,0.002754771,0.001548089,0.0001042452,0.000004632661,0.000004586375,0.000009243775,0.0009277168],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02277019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998825,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02453909084869874,"score_gpt":0.2664290094146887,"score_spread":0.24188991856599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}