{"id":"W2902789147","doi":"10.1130/abs/2018am-322346","title":"HYDROLOGIC RESPONSE TO GROUNDWATER WITHDRAWALS IN THE UPPER WABASH RIVER","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America","topic":"Water Resources and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Groundwater; Hydrology (agriculture); Environmental science; Geology; Geotechnical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002438893,0.0001344781,0.0002228849,0.0004964106,0.0006270963,0.0009601104,0.0002708593,0.0005619593,0.001901617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001051912,0.0001440916,0.0002136949,0.0006138938,0.0004664769,0.0003782946,0.0006164778,0.0005629905,0.0001799899],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001122009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001016284,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.101913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1733641,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998459,0.0000334875,0.00001408537,0.00002540733,0.00002047476,0.00006067309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995071,0.0001016095,0.0001084814,0.00002341693,0.0001228967,0.0001366509],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001146454,0.0005307094,0.9591079,0.00004938654,0.0001915781,0.0009946395,0.001952764,0.003645852,0.01803312,0.0006330193,0.001587873,0.01212679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001483692,0.00007844774,0.9942977,0.000006121656,0.00002262859,0.00003276704,0.002315042,0.001785588,0.0007180463,0.0001081558,0.0006140771,0.000006616999],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.999128,0.000008898253,0.00002386482,0.00009132915,0.000005143538,0.000004932294,0.00008429554,0.000006226477,0.0006473163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993159,0.00001332552,0.00002433869,0.00002541826,0.000003235977,0.000005094801,0.0001011215,0.000001856926,0.0005097511],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.101913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2026396,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01420115792840439,"score_gpt":0.2328462319660071,"score_spread":0.2186450740376027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}