{"id":"W2902789147","doi":"10.1130/abs/2018am-322346","title":"HYDROLOGIC RESPONSE TO GROUNDWATER WITHDRAWALS IN THE UPPER WABASH RIVER","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America","topic":"Water Resources and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Groundwater; Hydrology (agriculture); Environmental science; Geology; Geotechnical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007749595,0.000203689,0.0002329224,0.00001464907,0.0001505264,0.00004428188,0.0005441142,0.00009079282,0.0007651556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001987739,0.0001000606,0.0001126279,0.0004251682,0.002033391,0.0001097563,0.0003516816,0.0001934948,0.0004756768],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005193813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004493204,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00236319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005538575,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99808,0.0001554638,0.0002836802,0.0004429529,0.0004607015,0.0005772109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993072,0.00009174607,0.0001319453,0.0003485492,0.00001467738,0.0001058579],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002983312,0.003856083,0.7126812,0.00003784993,0.0001824887,0.0001259319,0.05038594,0.006961805,0.002198659,0.00002508314,0.02081972,0.1997419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003612506,0.004133243,0.7096165,0.00001372552,0.0000153045,0.000009104428,0.001140147,0.0001561839,0.0001471102,0.0002081734,0.2839933,0.0002059605],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9879938,0.000007410914,0.0003365291,0.007313118,0.00001593051,0.000751363,6.615837e-7,0.0000461798,0.003534973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9744022,0.000006724074,0.01772428,0.007203957,0.00003327066,0.0001019312,0.000004014049,0.000009539175,0.0005140951],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2631736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8377917,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01420115792840439,"score_gpt":0.2328462319660071,"score_spread":0.2186450740376027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}