{"id":"W2902854630","doi":"10.1080/02664763.2018.1552668","title":"Testing homogeneity in a heteroscedastic contaminated normal mixture","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Statistics","topic":"Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Waterloo; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Homogeneity (statistics); Heteroscedasticity; Statistics; Mixture model; Inference; Mathematics; Normal distribution; Test statistic; Type I and type II errors; Statistical hypothesis testing; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06503824,0.001313192,0.003041273,0.002944321,0.001094814,0.00322972,0.00390319,0.003193339,0.003579656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2400969,0.001098196,0.002728996,0.002731893,0.005405874,0.004139657,0.003932492,0.002859873,0.0007395941],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001627323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002219655,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002275794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001077105,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9495795,0.03275711,0.002246252,0.008126241,0.00602832,0.001262652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7266879,0.2428949,0.009729361,0.01318422,0.006484416,0.001019187],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003154975,0.0004865895,0.08460681,0.001151908,0.002707838,0.00236788,0.002691453,0.2547692,0.008528305,0.4156204,0.003718154,0.2201964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003380664,0.0006386231,0.01621946,0.000194907,0.0003559848,0.001141042,0.0003959665,0.6441596,0.005134634,0.3277504,0.003478617,0.000192799],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.04890049,0.0003687278,0.9484606,0.0004852795,0.00006302185,0.0002205703,0.0002494356,0.0003457945,0.0009060559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7085083,0.0003809558,0.2864128,0.0005908174,0.0001742851,0.001050167,0.001088918,0.0001556968,0.001638031],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06503824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3439592,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3281221244516936,"score_gpt":0.4940281685056337,"score_spread":0.1659060440539401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}