{"id":"W2903038413","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2018-0265","title":"Bargaining costs in a common pool resource situation — the case of reindeer husbandry and forestry in northern Sweden","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Forest Institute; Vetenskapsrådet; Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas","keywords":"Transaction cost; Animal husbandry; Resource (disambiguation); Business; Bargaining power; Database transaction; Natural resource economics; Land use; Environmental resource management; Economics; Microeconomics; Geography; Ecology; Computer science; Agriculture","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002470646,0.0005327183,0.0009406136,0.001317274,0.003045587,0.005340092,0.001107659,0.002135752,0.005502809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007221508,0.000424585,0.0008031881,0.001079904,0.00333262,0.003781945,0.002867606,0.001367586,0.0002697396],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007045154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002958391,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05965655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05428444,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975876,0.00134937,0.0000871661,0.0001982434,0.000262612,0.0005150818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956349,0.002903951,0.0005834129,0.0002217566,0.0002663324,0.000389795],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000451036,0.0003443375,0.0243079,0.0001574854,0.0001382584,0.004528262,0.006593077,0.3841917,0.0008300357,0.5645476,0.001479068,0.0124312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003456505,0.0005000436,0.02917618,0.0002423931,0.0003027472,0.001592745,0.05659599,0.5920774,0.0009940116,0.3049275,0.01296846,0.0002769685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9435886,0.0003052515,0.01334875,0.001302351,0.00002796164,0.00007506087,0.00006748347,0.00001824846,0.04126632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963505,0.0001010744,0.001568074,0.0000217286,0.000004341793,0.00003367601,0.00001612011,0.00000412087,0.001900275],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05965655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1186187,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03635137960544337,"score_gpt":0.3145788873977706,"score_spread":0.2782275077923272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}