{"id":"W2903080744","doi":"10.1029/2018jd028754","title":"Evaluation of Gridded Precipitation Data and Interpolation Methods for Forest Fire Danger Rating in Alberta, Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Alberta Agriculture and Forestry","keywords":"Kriging; Environmental science; Precipitation; Meteorology; Covariate; Climatology; Statistics; Geography; Mathematics; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003190984,0.0005823541,0.0004104361,0.001511423,0.0007542048,0.001214592,0.001414561,0.0003108454,0.001837075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01011601,0.0002600381,0.000407237,0.002647593,0.0002829841,0.0004264975,0.0005469765,0.000357102,0.0002194889],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009329261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008971296,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9635645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9605766,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988554,0.0002666506,0.00006637193,0.0001509507,0.0005655177,0.00009518752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939482,0.001514822,0.0003118443,0.0002402449,0.003782133,0.0002026966],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001149471,0.0004230095,0.3208992,0.0002697229,0.0002571838,0.0001370932,0.0004328852,0.4298716,0.003283991,0.001079841,0.004717957,0.237478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001210781,0.00007301746,0.1545215,0.00003736334,0.00005000511,0.0000173291,0.0003947653,0.8410329,0.00196341,0.0001984423,0.001541801,0.00004849177],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9674635,0.000439042,0.02052056,0.0003043401,0.00003650393,0.0002833733,0.004995891,0.001365471,0.004591287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9516,0.0002145468,0.04228117,0.00003549705,0.000007663354,0.00007725231,0.00396429,0.00008531143,0.001734283],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03643554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07330018,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06108026923563062,"score_gpt":0.4056141745827727,"score_spread":0.3445339053471421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}