{"id":"W2903150285","doi":"10.20944/preprints201811.0587.v1","title":"Polymer Injectivity: Investigation of Mechanical Degradation of EOR Polymers Using In-Situ Rheology","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Preprints.org","topic":"Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Norges Forskningsråd; Energi Simulation","keywords":"Rheology; Rheometer; Viscoelasticity; Polymer; Materials science; Polymer degradation; Enhanced oil recovery; Polyacrylamide; Viscosity; Porous medium; Shear rate; Composite material; Shear thinning; Apparent viscosity; Chemical engineering; Porosity; Polymer chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006576636,0.0003274695,0.0006626733,0.0005577113,0.00001741308,0.000004499927,0.0003998406,0.0006779366,0.0001486594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002172146,0.0004029433,0.0001504517,0.0003111897,0.0002046858,0.0001741479,0.0006849429,0.000651215,0.00001629159],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002962305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001514161,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006562706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001825176,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978778,0.000181062,0.000842445,0.0005439368,0.0002688803,0.0002859144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984668,0.00009956992,0.0004096686,0.000828034,0.00012541,0.00007055367],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003239271,0.00003169794,0.1152664,0.0004109305,0.00007038447,0.000001330178,0.0002901103,0.00168551,0.8805066,0.000535306,0.000003158503,0.001166114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001563666,0.00002665022,0.04673022,0.0004652803,0.00004374147,0.000004184211,0.00002111329,0.00472939,0.9435852,0.003959351,0.000004248976,0.000274281],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9793776,0.0001802279,0.01714681,0.000015238,0.0005292089,0.0004027939,0.00001444306,0.0002577617,0.002075887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950318,0.0001171039,0.004564781,0.00001338681,0.00005547484,0.00005553953,0.00003000793,0.00006787108,0.00006401198],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0685362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998422,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07872325140122217,"score_gpt":0.3180430665723651,"score_spread":0.239319815171143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}