{"id":"W2903236825","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.11.017","title":"Quality of stepped-wedge trial reporting can be reliably assessed using an updated CONSORT: crowd-sourcing systematic review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital","funders":"Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care - Greater Manchester; Menzies Centre for Australian Studies, King's College London, University of London; Université de Nantes; Universiteit Utrecht; Keele University; University of Southampton; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale; University of Oxford; University of Leicester; National Institute for Health and Care Research; Imperial College London; Gillings School of Public Health; Oxford Brookes University; Medical Research Council; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine","keywords":"Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials; CRTS; Guideline; Medicine; Randomized controlled trial; Sample size determination; Randomization; Research design; Clinical study design; Medical physics; Family medicine; Clinical trial; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Surgery","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.732436,0.003137822,0.01273589,0.01962507,0.003705548,0.0149622,0.006850354,0.008834372,0.00855264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8985574,0.004506957,0.02146021,0.02042666,0.006852628,0.01199477,0.01142377,0.007306547,0.002706829],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008413428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03454039,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002179972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003922248,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1031023,0.5252364,0.3082439,0.0131793,0.04883704,0.001401002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.06041993,0.6372102,0.1236521,0.08763919,0.08919831,0.001880291],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"reporting","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004737657,0.0002526584,0.01607207,0.5501852,0.04826714,0.0004478862,0.01269733,0.00272398,0.001815847,0.02238762,0.08713568,0.2532769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01680544,0.001793027,0.03449811,0.5509472,0.06623016,0.001011238,0.002742596,0.01332058,0.006885293,0.07479409,0.2287352,0.002236969],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.02228257,0.103583,0.4240547,0.04756311,0.02340875,0.3235895,0.03151164,0.004394817,0.01961203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08753741,0.02096182,0.3388316,0.008874948,0.002360279,0.5329375,0.0061019,0.0008647133,0.001529881],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.267564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3299541,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9737117944876668,"score_gpt":0.7516357972270948,"score_spread":0.2220759972605719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}