{"id":"W2903258941","doi":"10.1111/sjos.12317","title":"Uncertainty Quantification in Case of Imperfect Models: A Non‐Bayesian Approach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scandinavian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Mathematics; Quantile; Point estimation; Uncertainty quantification; Confidence interval; Coverage probability; Prediction interval; Interval (graph theory); Bayesian probability; Bounded function; Imperfect; Sensitivity analysis; Stochastic modelling; Order statistic; Uncertainty analysis; Applied mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003352985,0.0001367176,0.0004370108,0.0004914174,0.00007397849,0.00006460895,0.0004471392,0.00007671192,0.00004536988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001772207,0.00009774529,0.00007539047,0.0007588901,0.0002836389,0.0002151951,0.00003192667,0.0002144558,0.000006416639],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009496587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001838511,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008342535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000367914,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9975598,0.0001672496,0.001215457,0.0002106858,0.0006231053,0.0002237122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971772,0.0006830849,0.0006976622,0.0003446642,0.0009452949,0.0001520392],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001015107,0.0009112524,0.01085137,0.0002424109,0.0001644451,0.002586283,0.01561225,0.6863093,0.001360645,0.1147022,0.02023906,0.1460056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007806545,0.0006383086,0.001878478,0.0001283613,0.00003988739,0.001699535,0.001659485,0.8916876,0.0001362853,0.1011342,0.0000472336,0.000170026],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0421954,0.00008290061,0.956475,0.00002876207,0.0003054915,0.0001181091,0.00009755333,0.000003884351,0.0006928925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8602411,0.00001390444,0.139559,0.000007275565,0.00009229072,0.000001486832,0.00000237692,0.0000102359,0.00007235498],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8180457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3985937,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09217781081737214,"score_gpt":0.3488755702493089,"score_spread":0.2566977594319368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}