{"id":"W2903358528","doi":"10.18260/1-2--30470","title":"Examining the Engineering Leadership Literature: Community of Practice Style","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Engineering Education and Curriculum Development","field":"Engineering","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Leadership style; Community of practice; Context (archaeology); Situated learning; Shared leadership; Interdependence; Relevance (law); Socialization; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Knowledge management; Pedagogy; Engineering; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002167507,0.0001019513,0.00009374061,0.00002721257,0.0000373495,0.00003211386,0.0001919646,0.00003860245,0.00004547908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003002603,0.00007889292,0.00002230096,0.0003548374,0.00001014502,0.0001281111,0.00002532177,0.0004165887,0.00001687427],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002083847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001045894,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004179664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.38588e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995097,0.00003326931,0.0001575569,0.00005580228,0.0001113409,0.0001323326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994688,0.0002364527,0.00001873418,0.0001664621,0.00004367632,0.00006587804],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001828319,0.0002012694,0.0006463554,0.002787449,0.0005868896,0.00001223831,0.2546935,0.6060464,0.04547018,0.01074738,0.06485552,0.01393455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001335483,0.0002795396,0.0313484,0.0008082507,0.0001444962,0.00009910294,0.1058232,0.424807,0.07160482,0.00002154751,0.3619385,0.001789673],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.692792,0.01236999,0.1638542,0.02314608,0.003641024,0.001280879,0.00002355072,0.00572075,0.09717153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944401,0.00003246364,0.004790518,0.0005784191,0.00005939339,0.00001102818,0.000006040052,0.00002035056,0.00006164508],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3016482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.321716,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06570892861612314,"score_gpt":0.2341255924821839,"score_spread":0.1684166638660607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}